Comparison · Power stations

BLUETTI Elite 10 Mini Power Station vs FlashFish E200 Portable Power Station

The difference that matters

The FlashFish E200 Portable Power Station stores 23 Wh more (18% more). Per kWh of storage the FlashFish E200 Portable Power Station costs less ($662 vs $930). The BLUETTI Elite 10 Mini Power Station lists LiFePO4 chemistry; the other lists NMC lithium-ion.

Side by side

SpecificationBLUETTI Elite 10 Mini Power StationFlashFish E200 Portable Power Station
BrandBLUETTIFlashfish
Battery capacity128 Wh151 Wh
Continuous AC output200 W200 W
Surge output (as stated)300 W—
Battery chemistryLiFePO4NMC lithium-ion
Cycle life3,000 cycles800 cycles
Solar input (as stated)100 W—
AC charging input150 W—
Weight3.97 lb4.08 lb
Warranty3 years1 Year Warranty
Usable energy (Wattstanding calc, 85%)109 Wh128 Wh
Refrigerator runtime (calc)1.8 h2.1 h
Price per kWh of storage (calc)$930$662
Price seen$119$100
Sellers11

Highlighted rows differ. Figures come from each product's sources; runtime, recharge and cost rows are Wattstanding calculations using the same method for both.

Which should you choose?

BLUETTI Elite 10 Mini Power Station

Choose the BLUETTI Elite 10 Mini Power Station if you want LiFePO4 for long-term standby use.

Full reference →

FlashFish E200 Portable Power Station

Choose the FlashFish E200 Portable Power Station if you want longer runtime from one charge or you want the most energy per dollar.

Full reference →

Before you buy either

  • Total your loads with the appliance load & runtime calculator.
  • Confirm what each seller includes — accessories, software trials and bundles change often.
  • Read the limitations on each full reference page.

Wattstanding compares published specifications; we have not tested these products side by side. How we work · Disclosure